Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75(2): 133-143. (1994). (Van Heugten et al, 2015) Systematic review of studies (51) investigating convergent, criterion and predictive validity of cognitive dysfunction in patients in the acute phase (4 weeks) post stroke using multi-domain instruments. Find it on PubMed. (Naghdi et al, 2016) Two raters administered the Persian FIM and the Barthel Index to 40 patient, mean age of 60 (±14.9) years old and an average of 21 (± 23) months post first stroke . "Rehabilitation outcome of Turkish stroke patients: in a team approach setting." Find it on PubMed, Price, G. L., Kendall, M., et al. With 30+ sites in Illinois, we may be closer than you think! J Neurosci Nurs 32(1): 17-21. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic was not significant (ρ = 0.93). The language, personality, thinking, and vision domains were not significant. A study of the psychometric properties. 4 0 obj (2007). Find it on PubMed, Hall, K. M., Bushnik, T., et al. (2015) Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident. Participants received constraint-induced movement therapy, bilateral arm training, or conventional rehabilitation for two hour sessions, five times per week for three weeks. The validity of the FIM associated with the actual LOS was lower (-0.6846) compared to the SIS-16 (-0.7953) and the STREAM Total (-0.7972). Find it on PubMed, Denti, L., Agosti, M., et al. The SRM (admission to discharge change score) was 2.34 for the motor FIM (P<0.0001). In addition, total FIM ratings increased for all three group form discharge to three months post, but then showed little change after. The meaning of the FIM1 is also explained earlier. Find it on PubMed, Jackson, A. 2014 Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Cognitive Behavioral Rating Scale for stroke patients. The adjusted R2 was 0.173 (p = 0.000) for M-FIM gain and the significant factors were the admission M-FIM (B = 0.809, SE = 0.199, β = -0.446, p = 0.000) and if the patient had diabetes Mellitus (B = 14.269, SE = 6.775, β = -0.177, p = 0.037). J Spinal Cord Med 31(5): 487-499. (2012). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80(2): 121-125; quiz 126, 146. The Conistat, Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MOCA] and Functional Independence Measure-Cognitive showed adequate predictive validity. Bates, B.E., Xie, D., et al. (1993). In a prospective observational study of 122 patients with a first time stroke admitted to a rehabilitation center over a 12 month period: The FIM score on admission and discharge significantly predicted the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale [PRPS] (0.53; P<0.0001 and 0.40; P<0.001 respectively). Find it on PubMed. Excellent intra rater reliability was observed within the FIM+FAM-J full scale, motor subscale and cognitive subscale ((0.83, 0.80 and 0.98 respectively). Enter your term in the search box of the website or check out 50+ related full forms … (2016) Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke. FIM1 Stands For : Factor Interacting with MCK1p. (Lundgren-Nilsson, 2006; Kucukdeveci A, 2001), Subjective reports of pain (15.5%) and loss of strength (17.9%) were most frequently identified as causes of change in FIM instrument activities and quality of life for individuals with chronic SCI (Price et al. (2015). J Rehabil Med 42(7): p. 609-13.Find it in PubMed, Sasaki, T., et al. J Spinal Cord Med 33(4): 379-386. Find it on PubMed, Tur, B. S., Gursel, Y. K., et al. We used the following formula to calculate the cutoff value of SEM: SE = [v ∗ (1 − r)] 1 / 2 where r is reliability and v is variance of the score distribution. "Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke." Find it on PubMed, Kay, E., Deutsch, A., et al. (2002). (2008). "Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation." Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a blood disorder in which platelet clumps form in small blood vessels. Barthel Index can be measured directly or estimated from the Northwick Park Dependency Scale (NPDS) or the FIM. J Rehabil Med 43(3): p. 181-9. You might also like some similar terms related to FIM1 to know more about it. Find it on PubMed. (2002). Clin Rehabil 18(2): 164-171. (Caglar, 2014) A retrospective analysis on 142 patients post-stroke that went to an IRF. PM R,. (2004). Int J Rehabil Res 37(4): p. 343-8. 2010 Clinical Outcome Variables Scale: A retrospective validation study in patients after stroke. Assessments were administered prior and after therapy, and a Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector method was used to identify the strongest predictors of change on the Stroke Impact Scale.